A visual representation of an agency's growth journey, highlighting the challenges and inconsistencies in their sales proposals before implementing an AI Design Sprint.

Part 2 of 11: Sales Pitch and Proposal

Simplify Proposals, Unify Team Input, and Avoid Overpromising with AI Design Sprint™

Hey there! Just a quick reminder, this article is part of a series.

Don’t worry if you’re just joining us now, you can catch up on the story so far by checking out Part 1, where we explored how an agency could use the AI Design Sprint™ to supercharge their lead generation and qualification process.

Now, in Part 2, we’re diving deep into how they transformed their sales pitches and proposals using the same innovative approach.

Let’s start.

Have you ever felt overwhelmed by the complexities of creating the perfect sales pitch or proposal? You’re not alone. Crafting proposals that win clients, streamline your workflow, and maintain honesty can be a daunting task. Many agencies struggle to balance team inputs, ensure consistency, and avoid overpromising, which can lead to underdelivering.

Today, I want to share how the AI Design Sprint™ can revolutionise your sales pitch and proposal process. By integrating AI, agencies can simplify proposal creation, unify team contributions, and ensure commitments are always realistic. The result? More client wins, happier clients, and a team that thrives on collaboration.

If your agency is struggling with fragmented proposal workflows, misaligned team inputs, or the common pitfall of overpromising, this article is for you. Let’s explore how you can refine your sales pitch and proposal strategy with precision and innovation.

Understanding the Agency

The Agency That Struggled with Sales Proposals

Let me introduce you to an agency that was experiencing rapid growth. They started as a one-person web design company but quickly expanded their services to include comprehensive digital strategies, content marketing, and social media management. With this growth came new roles: Sales Manager, Proposal Writer, Creative Director, Account Executives, and Data Analysts. Exciting times, indeed!

But with great growth came significant challenges. Their proposals were inconsistent. Each one looked different, the quality varied, and integrating inputs from various departments was a nightmare. Additionally, the pressure to secure clients sometimes led them to promise more than they could deliver, risking their credibility and client relationships. Does this sound familiar?

Symptoms of Inefficiency

  • Every proposal felt like a different story, making it tough to present a unified brand image.
  • Multiple team members contributing without a streamlined process led to conflicting information and delays.
  • In the excitement to win clients, they occasionally promised more than they could deliver, risking their credibility.
  • Manual creation and approval processes stretched the time from pitch to proposal delivery, making them less competitive.

The Six Staff Members: Why Each Role Matters

Let’s meet the key players in their story.

  • The Sales Manager (SM) is the strategist behind client acquisition, but juggling proposal timelines was her Achilles’ heel.
  • The Proposal Writer (PW) is the wordsmith who crafts detailed proposals but struggles to merge inputs from various departments seamlessly.
  • The Creative Director (CD) is the guardian of their brand’s image, ensuring every proposal looks and feels on-brand.
  • The Account Executives (AE) are the front-liners gathering client requirements, often finding it tough to sync their insights efficiently.
  • The Data Analyst (DA) is the numbers guru supplying data-driven insights but hampered by fragmented data sources.
  • Lastly, the Project Manager (PM) is the coordinator battling disjointed workflows and communication gaps to keep everything on track.

Bringing these roles together in an online AI Design Sprint™ workshop was a game-changer. Facilitated by a certified expert, their goal was clear: overhaul their sales pitch and proposal process, unify team inputs, and embed AI-driven efficiencies from the ground up.

The Steps

Transformations like these need a roadmap. They followed a structured AI Design Sprint™ process, ensuring every detail was covered and every voice was heard.

Mapping the Current Proposal Process (Steps 1–3)

Step 1: Check Whether the Process Describes Reality

They kicked things off with Zoom and Miro, mapping out their existing proposal workflows. Everyone shared how proposals were ideated, created, reviewed, and delivered. Within an hour, their current state looked something like this:

  1. Client Enquiry: Initial contact from a potential client expressing interest.
  2. Initial Consultation: Meeting to understand client needs and objectives.
  3. Proposal Drafting: Writing the first draft of the proposal.
  4. Internal Review: Reviewing the draft internally for accuracy and consistency.
  5. Client Presentation: Presenting the proposal to the client.
  6. Follow-Up and Negotiation: Engaging with the client to address questions and negotiate terms.
  7. Proposal Finalisation: Making final adjustments and sending the approved proposal.
  8. Contract Signing: Formalising the agreement with the client.

During this step, the team discussed how each stage was executed and identified discrepancies between the documented process and actual practices. This conversation highlighted areas where informal practices deviated from the intended workflow, providing a realistic view of their proposal process.

Step 2: Mark and Describe Pain Points with Red Post-Its

Using red sticky notes, they pinpointed the major obstacles. The lack of standardised templates led to inconsistency during proposal drafting. Manual approvals created bottlenecks in the internal review stage. Messaging inconsistencies during client presentations sometimes led to overpromising, and tracking client interactions became a mess during follow-up stages. The team shared their frustrations and experiences, discussing how these pain points affected their daily work and the overall efficiency of the proposal process. This open dialogue ensured that everyone was on the same page regarding the challenges they faced.

Step 3: Mark High-Value Points with Green Dots

They then prioritised the most critical issues with green dots. Standardised proposal templates, a streamlined review process, consistent messaging, and automated follow-up tracking emerged as their focus areas for AI integration. In a lively discussion, team members voted on which pain points would deliver the most significant improvements if addressed. This prioritisation helped them focus their efforts on the areas that would make the biggest impact.

AI Cards and Prioritisation (Steps 4–5)

Step 4: Go Through AI Cards Two at a Time, Copy Them If Relevant

They explored AI solution categories. AI Content Generation tools assist in drafting proposal sections with consistent quality. AI Workflow Automation systems automate review and approval processes. AI Data Integration solutions consolidate inputs from various team members, and AI Compliance Checks ensure proposals meet ethical and brand standards. The team examined each AI category, discussing how these solutions could address their identified pain points. By understanding the capabilities of each AI tool, they could better match them to their specific needs.

Step 5: Prioritise the Three Most Important AI Cards for Each Step

Through dot-voting, they landed on AI Content Generation to standardise proposal content, AI Workflow Automation to streamline internal reviews, and AI Data Integration to unify inputs from Sales, Creative, and Data teams. After reviewing the options, the team collectively agreed that these three AI solutions would most effectively tackle their top pain points. This consensus ensured that their focus was aligned and that they were prioritising solutions with the highest potential impact.

Focusing the Sprint (Steps 6–7)

Step 6: Select Two Process Steps to Focus On

They decided to zero in on proposal drafting and the internal review process. Ensuring standardised, high-quality content during drafting and streamlining approvals to reduce bottlenecks were identified as the most impactful areas for improvement. The team discussed which stages of the proposal process would benefit most from AI integration. By focusing on these two critical areas, they aimed to create a solid foundation for improving overall efficiency.

Step 7: Move and Reformulate the Two Selected Focus Points

These became their anchor points: the AI-Powered Proposal Generator, which creates standardised, high-quality proposal drafts, and the Automated Review Workflow, which accelerates the internal approval process with minimal manual intervention. During this step, they redefined their focus areas to clearly outline how AI would enhance each process. This clarity helped the team understand the specific roles AI would play in their proposal workflow.

Integrating and Examining Neighbouring Steps (Steps 8–9)

Step 8: Integrate the Anchor Points into the Existing Process

They introduced the AI-Powered Proposal Generator to create initial drafts based on standardised templates and client inputs. Simultaneously, they implemented the Automated Review Workflow to manage approvals, track feedback, and ensure timely revisions. They mapped out how these AI tools would fit into their current workflow, ensuring a seamless transition. The team discussed the integration points and how each role would interact with the new systems.

Step 9: See How Neighbouring Steps Are Influenced

AI can now suggest tailored proposal elements based on client data and past interactions during the client enquiry and initial consultation stages. Consistent proposal content enhances the clarity and professionalism of their client presentations. Additionally, automated tracking ensures timely and organised follow-ups, reducing missed opportunities. The team evaluated the ripple effects of integrating AI into their proposal process. This foresight helped them anticipate and address potential changes in related stages, ensuring a holistic improvement.

Big-Picture Review & People-AI Interactions (Steps 10–12)

Step 10: Rethink the Entire Process

They stepped back to ensure their revamped workflow addressed the initial pain points without introducing new challenges. It was about making sure AI would enhance their efficiency and consistency while keeping their creative and strategic edge intact. The team engaged in a thorough review, discussing whether the new integrations aligned with their overall goals and maintained their agency’s unique value proposition. This step was crucial for ensuring that the AI tools complemented rather than compromised their creative processes.

Step 11: Add How and Where People Could Help AI Perform Well

  • The Sales Manager (SM) oversees the AI Proposal Generator, providing strategic inputs and refining outputs.
  • The Proposal Writer (PW) collaborates with AI tools to draft and personalise proposal content.
  • The Creative Director (CD) ensures AI-generated proposals align with the brand’s creative standards.
  • Account Executives (AE) input client requirements and feedback into the AI system.
  • The Data Analyst (DA) supplies data-driven insights to inform proposal content.
  • Lastly, the Project Manager (PM) coordinates the Automated Review Workflow, ensuring smooth approvals and timely revisions.

They delineated each team member’s role in the AI-enhanced process, ensuring that everyone knew how to interact with the new tools effectively. This clarity fostered ownership and accountability within the team.

Step 12: Mark Sketches Where a Person Interacts with AI

They created a flow diagram to visualise interactions. The Account Executives input client requirements into the AI Proposal Generator. The Proposal Writer reviews and personalises AI-generated drafts. The Creative Director ensures alignment with brand standards. The Project Manager manages the Automated Review Workflow, tracking approvals and feedback. By mapping out these interactions, the team gained a clear understanding of their touchpoints with the AI tools. This visual aid facilitated smoother collaboration and highlighted areas where human input was essential.

Refining Anchors & Tasks (Steps 13–14)

Step 13: Revisit Anchor Points and Improve Descriptions

They refined their anchor points to ensure clarity and precision. The AI-Powered Proposal Generator now drafts comprehensive proposals based on standardised templates, client inputs, and data-driven insights. The Automated Review Workflow manages proposal approvals, tracks feedback, and ensures timely revisions through AI-driven task assignments and notifications. This step helped the team fully grasp the functionalities and benefits of each AI tool, facilitating better implementation.

Step 14: Break Each Anchor Point into Four Sub-Steps

For the AI-Powered Proposal Generator:

  1. Template Configuration: Define standardised proposal templates with consistent branding and structure.
  2. Client Data Integration: Input client-specific information and requirements into the AI system.
  3. Draft Generation: AI generates the initial proposal draft based on templates and client data.
  4. Human Refinement: Proposal Writer reviews, edits, and personalises the AI-generated draft.

For the Automated Review Workflow:

  1. Submission for Review: Completed proposals are automatically routed to relevant team members for review.
  2. Feedback Collection: AI collects and organises feedback from reviewers.
  3. Revision Tracking: Automated notifications ensure timely revisions and updates.
  4. Final Approval: Project Manager oversees the final approval process, ensuring proposals meet all standards before delivery.

Breaking down each anchor point into actionable sub-steps provided a clear roadmap for implementation. The team could now follow these detailed steps to ensure each aspect of the process was addressed effectively.

Final Declarations & Ethical Checks (Steps 15–17)

Step 15: Restate the AI Technologies Used

They utilised AI Content Generation through natural language processing models for drafting proposal sections. AI Workflow Automation was implemented using machine learning algorithms to manage review and approval processes. AI Data Integration consolidated inputs from Sales, Creative, and Data teams into a unified proposal system. They reiterated the technologies involved to ensure everyone was on the same page regarding the tools they were implementing. This step reinforced the technical foundation of their new process.

Step 16: Give the New Process a Catchy Name

They named their new process “ProposalSync,” highlighting the seamless synchronisation and intelligent automation it brings to their proposal creation and management. Choosing a memorable name helped the team embrace the new process. It fostered a sense of identity and ownership, making it easier to communicate and refer to the system internally.

Step 17: Individually Select Relevant AI Ethics Cards

They selected Transparency, Privacy, Fairness, and Accountability. Transparency ensures they clearly communicate AI involvement in proposal generation. Privacy safeguards client data within the AI systems. Fairness avoids biased content generation and ensures equitable treatment of all proposals. Accountability maintains human oversight over AI-generated proposals to ensure accuracy and integrity. Addressing ethical considerations was paramount. The team discussed how to uphold these principles, ensuring their AI integrations were responsible and trustworthy.

Scenario Planning & Realignment (Steps 18–21)

Step 18: Write Best- and Worst-Case Scenarios

  • Best-case scenario: ProposalSync streamlines proposal creation, enhances consistency, and reduces turnaround time by 50% within three months, leading to a 20% increase in client acquisition.
  • Worst-case scenario: AI-generated proposals lack personalisation, leading to a decline in client trust and a decrease in proposal acceptance rates.

The team brainstormed potential outcomes, both positive and negative. This foresight helped them prepare strategies to maximise benefits and mitigate risks.

Step 19: Reflect on Implications for the AI Solution

To mitigate risks, they implemented rigorous Quality Assurance measures to ensure personalisation and accuracy in AI-generated proposals. Continuous Training of AI models with new data improved relevance and authenticity. Additionally, Feedback Loops encouraged team feedback to refine AI tools continuously. They discussed practical steps to address the worst-case scenarios, ensuring that their AI tools remained effective and trustworthy.

Step 20: Share with the Team and Align

They held an all-hands virtual meeting to present ProposalSync. Each role understood their responsibilities and the importance of collaboration in the AI-enhanced workflow. The team was excited and committed to the new process. Sharing the plan with the entire team fostered alignment and enthusiasm. Everyone felt involved and motivated to contribute to the successful implementation of the new system.

Step 21: Go Back to the Solution and Refine

Based on team feedback, they integrated advanced editing features for Proposal Writers to easily modify AI drafts, simplified the Automated Review Workflow for easier navigation and management, and scheduled comprehensive training sessions to ensure all team members were proficient with the new tools. Refining the solution based on feedback ensured that the tools were user-friendly and met the team’s needs effectively. This iterative improvement was key to smooth adoption.

Note: Typically, at this point, a “Tech Check” is done by either external partners or internal tech teams to see if the proposed solution is viable from a technical point of view. If yes, there would be an agile prototype phase to develop and fine-tune before going into full development and integration.

Pilot & External Feedback (Steps 22–24)

Step 22: Pitch the Solution to External Users

They rolled out a pilot version of ProposalSync with select clients. Clients appreciated the professional and consistent proposal format, but some desired more personalised elements, prompting further refinement. Engaging external users provided valuable insights into how their proposals were perceived, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement.

Step 23: Seek Feedback

They compiled feedback into a Miro board, highlighting strengths such as improved proposal quality and reduced creation time, alongside areas for improvement like enhanced personalisation and flexibility in proposal content. Organising feedback systematically allowed them to identify common themes and prioritise adjustments effectively.

Step 24: Discuss Feedback and Improve the Concept

Key adjustments included configuring AI tools to incorporate client-specific nuances and preferences, enabling the AI Proposal Generator to learn from past proposal successes and client feedback for better future outputs, and improving the workflow interface’s usability based on client and team suggestions. Implementing these refinements ensured that ProposalSync was more responsive to client needs and user-friendly for their team. With these refinements, ProposalSync was ready for full-scale implementation.

The Final Solution – “ProposalSync”

Recap of Pain Points Addressed

By the end of their 24-step journey, they had successfully tackled several key issues.

  • Inconsistent Proposal Quality was resolved through standardised templates and AI-generated drafts, ensuring uniformity across all proposals.
  • Disjointed Team Inputs were unified with AI Data Integration, bringing together inputs from Sales, Creative, and Data teams seamlessly.
  • Overpromising Capabilities were mitigated by Automated Review Workflows that incorporated checks to prevent overcommitments.
  • Time-Consuming Processes were significantly reduced through AI Workflow Automation, streamlining the proposal creation and approval timelines.

The Pilot Next Steps

Next Steps

Looking ahead, they plan to integrate machine learning models to enhance proposal generation with more nuanced and personalised content. They aim to incorporate deeper personalisation features to cater to diverse client needs and implement AI-driven analytics to predict proposal success rates and optimise their strategies accordingly.

Why a Step Process Works

Thoroughness vs. Speed

While the temptation to deploy AI solutions rapidly is strong, the complexity of sales proposals demands a thoughtful approach. Their structured AI Design Sprint™ ensured comprehensive problem identification, tackling root causes rather than just the symptoms. Systematic AI exploration allowed them to methodically evaluate AI solutions to find the perfect fit. Inclusive team involvement engaged all relevant roles, fostering ownership and collaboration. Robust testing and feedback integration validated solutions through pilot testing and iterative refinements.

Everyone Sees Their Part in the Puzzle

From the Sales Manager overseeing AI-driven proposal generation to the Analytics Specialist leveraging unified data for strategic decisions, every role understood their contribution. This holistic involvement ensured ProposalSync was seamlessly integrated and embraced across the agency.

AI with Purpose, Not Gimmick

Each AI solution directly addressed specific pain points. AI Content Generation enhanced consistency and efficiency in proposal creation. AI Workflow Automation streamlined approval processes, reducing delays and bottlenecks. AI Data Integration unified team inputs for coherent and comprehensive proposals. Ethical considerations, such as transparency and accountability, were integral, ensuring AI served as a tool for empowerment rather than replacement.

Key Takeaways

The Resulting “ProposalSync”

Their final ProposalSync includes standardised proposal templates, ensuring consistent quality and branding across all proposals. The AI-Powered Proposal Generator drafts comprehensive proposals based on standardised templates and client inputs. Human Refinement allows Proposal Writers to personalise and enhance AI-generated drafts. The Automated Review Workflow manages proposal approvals, tracks feedback, and ensures timely revisions. Unified Data Integration consolidates inputs from Sales, Creative, and Data teams into a single proposal system. Lastly, their ethics framework maintains transparency about AI involvement and ensures client data privacy.

Lessons

Tailoring AI tools to address specific pain points rather than adopting generic solutions was crucial. Engaging all relevant roles ensured a comprehensive and cohesive strategy implementation. Upholding ethical standards maintained trust and integrity in their AI-driven processes. Continuous feedback and iterative refinement enhanced the effectiveness and adaptability of their AI tools.

Forward-Looking Upgrades

With ProposalSync in place, their agency plans to develop a machine learning-based proposal generator to enhance personalisation and contextual relevance. They aim to expand to multimedia proposals by incorporating AI tools for generating and integrating multimedia elements. Additionally, integrating predictive analytics will help forecast proposal success rates and proactively adjust their strategies.

Last Thoughts

In the fast-paced world of digital marketing, blending creativity with precision is key. Integrating AI into your sales pitch and proposal strategy isn’t just about keeping up with trends—it’s about strategically implementing tools that solve real challenges and drive meaningful results.

For agencies struggling with inefficient proposal processes, embracing a structured AI Design Sprint™ can lead to a unified, efficient, and data-driven sales ecosystem.

Gather your team, dive into a collaborative AI Design Sprint™, and watch your sales pitch and proposal efforts transform into a synchronised and impactful force.